KH
KB HOME (KBH)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- KB Home delivered a clean beat: revenue $1.62B vs $1.586B consensus* and EPS $1.61 vs $1.494 consensus*, with adjusted housing gross margin (ex-charges) of 18.9%, above guidance high end, on stronger cost control and faster build times .
- Mix and pricing discipline drove margins despite softer YoY volume; deliveries fell 7% YoY to 3,393 and housing gross margin was 18.2% GAAP; adjusted to 18.9% excluding $11.3M inventory charges .
- Management pivoting back to built‑to‑order (BTO) (~70% target) from ~50% currently; BTO carries 250–500 bps higher margins, with build times down to 130 days (BTO ~122 days), underpinning 2026 trajectory .
- FY25 guidance trimmed again: housing revenue $6.10–$6.20B (from $6.30–$6.50B in Q2 and $6.60–$7.00B in Q1); Q4 guide: $1.6–$1.7B revenue, 18.0–18.4% housing GM, 9.3–9.7% SG&A, 8.5–8.9% HB OI margin .
- Capital returns remain a key pillar: $188.5M repurchased in Q3 ($438.5M YTD) and new $1B authorization announced after quarter; Q4 buybacks expected at $50–$150M, reinforcing EPS/book value accretion .
Values with * retrieved from S&P Global.
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Cost execution and cycle times: adjusted housing GM 18.9% (ex‑charges) beat the high end of guidance; build times fell to 130 days (BTO ~122) and direct costs declined ~2% q/q and ~3% y/y on Q3 starts .
- Pricing strategy: Transparent base pricing over incentives stabilized demand; 70% of communities had steady or higher prices in Q3, aiding margin resilience .
- Shareholder returns: Repurchased 3.3M shares for $188.5M at $57.12 (11% YTD share reduction), taking book value/share to $60.25 (+11% y/y); added a new $1B authorization post‑quarter .
-
What Went Wrong
- Volume softness: Deliveries down 7% y/y to 3,393 and net orders down 4% y/y to 2,950; absorption 3.8/month/community vs 4.1 y/y; cancellation rate rose to 17% (15% y/y) .
- Margin pressure vs prior year: GAAP housing GM 18.2% (–240 bps y/y) on price reductions, higher relative land costs, and mix; adjusted housing GM 18.9% (–180 bps y/y) .
- Backlog/ASP headwinds: Backlog units/value fell to 4,333/$1.99B (vs 5,724/$2.92B y/y); total ASP dipped to $475.7K with regional mix shift (Southeast/Boise/Seattle) weighing .
Financial Results
Values with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We achieved solid financial results in our third quarter, meeting or exceeding our guidance ranges... as we continued to make meaningful progress in reducing both our build times and costs to build.” – Jeffrey Mezger, CEO .
- “As our built‑to‑order mix grows, we believe it will support a higher gross margin as these homes currently generate a gross margin that is 250 to 500 basis points higher than our inventory homes.” – Jeffrey Mezger, CEO .
- “Further improving our build times was another area of strong execution... a 10‑day reduction sequentially to 130 calendar days… direct costs ~2% lower sequentially and ~3% lower year over year on our homes started during the third quarter.” – Rob McGibney, President & COO .
- “We reported net income of $110 million, or $1.61 per diluted share… We expect Q4 housing revenues between $1.6 billion and $1.7 billion… housing gross profit margin (ex‑charges) between 18% and 18.4%.” – Rob Dillard, CFO .
Q&A Highlights
- ASP and margins: Sequential order ASP pressure driven largely by regional mix (more Southeast/Boise/Seattle); management emphasized no read‑through to margin degradation as cost actions offset pricing .
- Demand vs rates:
60 bps mortgage rate decline boosted affordability ($30K purchasing power) but conversion lagged as buyers adopt wait‑and‑see; BTO “float‑down” option positioned to capture future rate declines . - BTO margin uplift: BTO margins exceed spec by 250–500 bps; shift back toward ~70/30 BTO/spec expected into early 2026, supporting margin trajectory .
- SG&A and Q4 cadence: SG&A improvement reflects fixed cost actions and compensation cadence, not pure operating leverage, aiding Q4 guide .
- Regional updates: Strength in Inland Empire, North Bay/Central Valley, Las Vegas, Houston, Charlotte; challenges in coastal CA, Seattle (improving), Denver; Florida/Texas stabilizing after targeted price resets and cost reductions .
Estimates Context
- Q3 beats: Revenue $1.62B vs $1.586B consensus* and EPS $1.61 vs $1.494 consensus*; gross margin outperformed internal guidance high end (adjusted 18.9%) .
- Recent pattern: Q2 also beat on both revenue ($1.530B vs $1.505B*) and EPS (1.50 vs 1.461*); Q1 missed both metrics vs consensus, reflecting earlier demand softness* .
- Q4 setup: Consensus revenue ~$1.663B* sits within Q4 guide of $1.6–$1.7B; consensus EPS ~$1.79* aligns with margin/SG&A guide .
Values with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Execution trumped softer demand: faster cycle times and lower direct costs lifted adjusted GM above guide, enabling a clean print and beat vs consensus .
- Strategic pivot to BTO should structurally lift margins into 2026; near‑term volume may be tempered but mix and pricing discipline support profitability .
- FY25 guidance trimmed again on orders/backlog, but Q4 guide brackets Street; watch Q4 absorption and Q1’26 order trends as key inflection indicators .
- Capital return remains a strong backstop (Q4 buybacks $50–$150M; new $1B authorization), driving EPS/book value accretion even in flat revenue scenarios .
- Regional mix and land costs are the main margin headwinds; ongoing cost reductions and measured land spend (easing prices/terms) mitigate risk .
- Liquidity is ample ($1.16B) with debt/cap ~33%, supporting flexibility through the pivot and potential demand upswing as affordability improves .
- Trading lens: Focus on updates to BTO mix, cost trajectory, and early‑2026 community count ramp; any sustained rate relief could accelerate orders given the BTO “float‑down” offering .
Appendix: Additional Context
- Q3 Non‑GAAP reconciliation: inventory‑related charges $11.3M; GAAP housing GM 18.2% vs adjusted 18.9% .
- Backlog trajectory: Units/value declined to 4,333/$1.99B from 4,776/$2.29B in Q2 and 4,436/$2.20B in Q1 .
- Buyback impact: Weighted average diluted shares down ~12% y/y in Q3, boosting per‑share metrics despite lower net income .